CO129-249 - Governor Des Voeus Acting Governor Barker - 1891 [1-5] — Page 557

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

long time based the justification of its action on the resolution of the Executive Council dated 7 September 1887 under the presidency of General Cameron, then Acting Governor,

copy of which was forwarded to the S. G. F. in my predecessor's letter No. 2111 of May 1889.

This resolution which was not communicated to the Military Authorities until the 23 January 1889 has now been practically proved to have been recorded, by some error, in a totally different form and sense to that in which it was passed, as admitted by Colonial Secretary's letter of 30th June 1890 (annexed hereto and marked C). The vitally important proviso which restricted its operations to "such cases as might be specially approved by the Major-General Commanding" being entirely omitted.

(b) The leases shown as granted "without demolition rights" (and the larger portion of the alienated reserves comes under this category) were, it appears, granted or promised under some informal or irregular permission dated 2nd April, 1886, which however the Colonial Government appears to consider binding on it but which was not communicated to the Military Authorities. The latter, on the contrary, were officially informed as late as February 1889 through reports by the Surveyor General officially communicated by the Government that no new Lots had been created within the clearance area and that there ...

Edit History

2026-05-26 19:40:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
long time based the justification of its action on the resolution of the Executive Council dated 7 September 1887 under the presidency of General Cameron, then Acting Governor, copy of which was forwarded to the S. G. F. in my predecessor's letter No. 2111 of May 1889. This resolution which was not communicated to the Military Authorities until the 23 January 1889 has now been practically proved to have been recorded, by some error, in a totally different form and sense to that in which it was passed, as admitted by Colonial Secretary's letter of 30th June 1890 (annexed hereto and marked C). The vitally important proviso which restricted its operations to "such cases as might be specially approved by the Major-General Commanding" being entirely omitted. (b) The leases shown as granted "without demolition rights" (and the larger portion of the alienated reserves comes under this category) were, it appears, granted or promised under some informal or irregular permission dated 2nd April, 1886, which however the Colonial Government appears to consider binding on it but which was not communicated to the Military Authorities. The latter, on the contrary, were officially informed as late as February 1889 through reports by the Surveyor General officially communicated by the Government that no new Lots had been created within the clearance area and that there ...
Baseline (Original)
long time based the justification of its action on the resolution of the Executive Council dated 7 September 1887 under the presidency. of General Cameron, then A Governor, C Acting copy of which was forwarded to the S. G. F. in predecessor's letter to 2111 of May. 1889. my This resolution which was not cated to the Mi Military January. Methorities until the 23. 1889 has now been practically prived to have been recorded, by totally different some error, in a form and sense to that in which it was passed, as admitted by. Colonial Secretary's letter of 30th June 1890 (annexed hereto and marked cf the vitally important proviso which restricted its ~ operations to "such cases as might be 552 "be specially approved by the Major_ "General Commanding "being entirely omitted. (b) The leases shown as granted "without demolition rights" (and the reserves comes under this. larger portion of the alicnated category) were, it appears, granted or promised under some informal or irregular permission dated 2 td April, 1886, which however the Colonial Government appears to consider binding me vey on it but which was corne runicated to the Military Authorities. The latter the contrary officially were ar informed as late as February 1889 through reports by the Surveyor General officially communicated, by the Government that no new Lots had been created within the clearance area and that there wr
2026-05-26 19:40:37 · Baseline
View content

long time based the justification of its action on the resolution of the Executive Council dated 7 September 1887 under the presidency.

of General Cameron, then A Governor,

C

Acting

copy of which was

forwarded to the S. G. F. in

predecessor's letter to 2111 of May. 1889.

my

This resolution which was not

cated to the Mi

Military

January.

Methorities until the 23.

1889 has now been practically prived to have been recorded, by

totally different

some error, in a

form and sense to that in which

it was passed, as admitted by. Colonial Secretary's letter of 30th

June 1890 (annexed hereto and marked cf the vitally important proviso which restricted its ~ operations to "such cases as might

be

552

"be specially approved by the Major_ "General Commanding "being

entirely omitted.

(b) The leases shown as

granted

"without demolition rights" (and

the

reserves comes

under this.

larger portion of the alicnated

category) were, it appears, granted or promised under some informal or irregular permission dated 2 td April, 1886, which however the Colonial

Government appears to consider binding

me vey

on it but which was

corne runicated to the

Military Authorities. The latter

the contrary officially

were ar

informed as late as

February 1889 through reports by the Surveyor General officially

communicated,

by the Government that no new

Lots had been created within the

clearance area and that there wr

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.